They are more alike than they look
Nearly every clipping network runs the same core model: a brand funds a pool, clippers submit, views are verified, payouts come out of the pool at a rate per hundred thousand views. The marketing differs far more than the mechanics do.
So comparing them on branding is a waste of time. Compare them on the five things below, which are the things that actually change what lands in your account.
The five questions
- View minimum — the single biggest filter on whether a beginner ever gets paid
- Payout speed and method — how long from approval to money, and whether you can actually receive it
- Rejection transparency — do you find out why a clip was rejected, or does it just vanish?
- Pool visibility — can you see how much budget is left before you commit a night?
- Platform coverage — does it accept the platforms you already post on?
What the process should look like
These are simplified screen examples. Always follow the live campaign brief when its rules differ.
Rate is a trap on its own
The highest advertised rate on any board is almost always attached to the highest view minimum, and often to the fullest pool. Rate multiplied by your realistic approval rate is the number to compare — and that is a number the network will never print for you.
Run more than one
There is no reason to be loyal to a single network. Campaigns end, pools empty, and a strong month on one is frequently a dead month on another. Working across several is how experienced clippers smooth their income — which is the entire reason this site indexes all of them in one place rather than running a single program.
The board shows every campaign we can see, ranked by how hot they run and how likely you are to actually get paid — including how full each pool already is.